1 Department of Construction Project Management – Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.
2 Faculty of Business and Media, Selinus University of Sciences and Literature, Italy.
3 Department of Business School, University of Wolverhampto- Business School, England, United Kingdom.
4 Mechanical Engineering, Oxfordshire Advanced Skill Centre (OAS), Culham Campus , Oxfordshire, UK.
5 Department Marketing, School of Management Sciences Kwara State polytechnic, kwara State, Nigeria.
6 MBA with Project Management, Abertay University, Bell Street, Dundee, DD1 1HG, United Kingdom.
7 School of Management Sciences and Accounting, Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.
8 School of Management Sciences, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 23(03), 500-508
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0875
Received on 21 August 2025; revised on 26 September 2025; accepted on 30 September 2025
This study examines how Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Digital Twin (DT) practices can be systematically extended into City Information Modelling (CIM) to enable evidence-based, bottom-up urban planning. Objectives were to map the BIM–DT–CIM literature, identify interoperable architectures that integrate GIS, IoT, and analytics, evaluate mechanisms for embedding citizen participation, and quantify persistent research gaps. We conducted a reproducible systematic review using staged searches across major databases (Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM, SpringerLink), exported and deduplicated results, and screened 1,124 records to a final corpus of 68 peer-reviewed studies; data were extracted using a standardised template and appraised with a technical maturity checklist. Key findings show that only 21% of included studies reported implemented citizen-participation mechanisms and 15% addressed cross-domain standard models; pilot projects that operationalised CIM reported an average planning-efficiency improvement of 18% (±4% SE) compared to baseline workflows. Major error sources include heterogeneity in metrics, inconsistent reporting of evaluation methods, and limited longitudinal evidence, which constrain meta-analytic synthesis. We conclude with a reproducible framework and an agenda prioritising standards, participatory evaluation, and data-governance experiments.
Building Information Modeling (BIM); Digital Twin (DT); City Information Modeling (CIM); Urban Governance; Smart Cities; Data Governance
Preview Article PDF
Elizabeth A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Victoria M. Jegede, Olabisi D, Salau, Kemi K. Oladapo, Bolanle B Olatunji and Rukayat Abisola Olawale. Advancing urban governance through integrated BIM–DT–CIM models. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 23(03), 500-508. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0875.