1 Department of Surgery No.2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
2 Department of Vascular Surgery, Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital, Lviv, Ukraine.
Received on 12 February 2024; revised on 19 March 2024; accepted on 21 March 2024
Introduction: in symptomatic patients with carotid artery disease (CAD), carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reduces the risk of major stroke and is highly beneficial in patients with 70% to 99% stenosis. However, patients with burdened neurological history, risk factors, and relative contraindications for surgery require thoughtful decision-making.
Case presentation: 51-year-old male patient with a previous ischemic stroke (mRS 3) with an area of infarction that exceeds one-third of the right middle cerebral artery, who had ipsilateral carotid artery critical stenosis and contralateral near-occlusion and suffered from recurrent ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks (TIA) despite being on medical treatment. The patient underwent CEA and was discharged on postoperative day 5 with partial improvement of neurological deficit. Follow-up on postoperative day 30 was unremarkable, after which neurological improvement occurred, and the patient was successfully discharged.
Conclusion: It is possible to perform CEA in symptomatic patients with significant neurological deficits and brain lesions if conservative treatment is ineffective and there are factors indicating the necessity for surgical intervention.
Case report; Carotid endarterectomy; Stroke; Decision-making; Neurological deficits
Preview Article PDF
Ihor I. Kobza, Vasyl V. Pelekh and Yuliya S. Mota. Carotid endarterectomy in a patient with recurrent transient ischemic attacks and burdened neurological history: A decision-making dilemma: Case report. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2024, 17(03), 268–272. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.3.0141