1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Forensic Science, SOBAS, Adamas University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
2 Undergraduate Student, Department of Forensic Science, SOBAS, Adamas University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
* Corresponding Author
ORCID Details
Satwik Chatterjee: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8064-6648
Anubrata Dutta: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6183-2109
Samrat Banerjee: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7062-8155
Deepraj Chattopadhyay: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9312-6734
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2026, 28(01), 062–070
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjbphs.2026.28.1.0502
Received on 31 August 2026; revised on 06 October 2026; accepted on 08 October 2026
Background: Complex death investigations require the interpretation of biological traces, skeletal remains, and pathological findings within a shared evidential framework. Fragmented examination can obscure the distinction between identifying a person and explaining their death.
Objective: To critically examine the complementary roles of forensic biology, forensic anthropology, and forensic medicine in human identification, trauma assessment, and postmortem reconstruction.
Approach: A targeted narrative synthesis of selected primary studies and authoritative forensic guidance was undertaken, emphasizing validation and interpretive limitations.
Synthesis: Genetic analysis supports identity and kinship assessment; anthropology contributes skeletal profiling, recovery, and contextual interpretation; forensic medicine evaluates injuries, disease, and potential causes of death. Their integration is particularly valuable for decomposed, fragmented, and commingled remains. Postmortem imaging, microbial succession, and stable isotope analysis expand investigative possibilities, but their evidential value depends on appropriate reference data, sampling, and validation. A proposed workflow links coordinated recovery, evidence-preserving examination, independent specialist assessment, and multidisciplinary reconciliation.
Conclusion: Effective integration requires question-specific interpretation rather than uncritical accumulation of apparently concordant findings. Transparent uncertainty, preservation of contradictory evidence, and separation of identity from causal conclusions are essential to scientifically defensible death investigation. The proposed framework offers a practical basis for collaborative casework and future validation studies.
Forensic biology; Forensic anthropology; Forensic medicine; Human identification; Medicolegal death investigation; Evidence integration.
Get Your e Certificate of Publication using below link
Preview Article PDF
Satwik Chatterjee, Anubrata Dutta, Samrat Banerjee and Deepraj Chattopadhyay. MOLECULES, BONES, AND THE BIOLOGY OF DEATH: BRIDGING FORENSIC BIOLOGY, ANTHROPOLOGY, AND MEDICINE IN HUMAN IDENTIFICATION AND DEATH INVESTIGATION. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2026, 28(01), 062–070. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2026.28.1.0502