Remarks on Complications from laser Endolift use: Case series and literature review
1 IALMS, International Academy for Laser Medicine and Surgery, Florence, Italy.
2 e-Campus University, Novedrate, Italy.
3 Micoralis Research Laboratory UPR7354, Côte d’Azur University, Nice, France.
Letter to the Editor
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2024, 17(01), 161–166.
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.1.0035
Publication history:
Received on 12 December 2023; revised on 23 January 2024; accepted on 25 January 2024
Abstract:
This Letter aims to make clear about the information reported in the paper "Complications from laser Endolift use: Case series and literature review," published in this journal (2023, 16(03), 023–041, DOI:https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2023.16.3.0496), where authors present a series of complications concerning the use of very different laser devices with different wavelengths, beam profiles, and laser optical fibers without detailing these characteristics or attributing them to a specific manufacturer.
The Tables inserted in the Letter demonstrate the fake relationship between complications and “EndoliftÒ” by Lasermar 1500tm, as asserted by Fabio dos Santos Borges et al.
The paper considering "EndoliftÒ" complications as relative to a multitude of techniques made with "different laser" is misleading; quite the opposite it should distinguish between the outcomes of the official “EndoliftÒ” by Lasemar 1500tm laser protocols, and other systems, very different by technical and methodological points of view.
Keywords:
Endolift; Endolaser; Endolifting; Laserlipolysis; Complications; Seroma; Steatonecrosis
Full text article in PDF:
Copyright information:
Copyright © 2024 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0