Home
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
ISSN Approved | International, Peer reviewed, Referred, Open access Journal

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Journal Policies
    • WJBPHS CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Current Issue
    • Issue in Progress
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Become a Reviewer panel member
    • Join as Editorial Board Member
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

ISSN Approved Journal | | IMPACT FACTOR 8.16 | | eISSN: 2582-5542 | |  Free Crossref DOI 

Fast Publication within 2 days | | Low Article Processing Charges | | Peer Reviewed and Referred Journal

Research and review articles are invited for publication in September 2026 (Volume 27, Issue 3) Submit Paper

Swiss Dock 2025: Docking approaches comparison between attracting cavities and autodockvina

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Swiss Dock 2025: Docking approaches comparison between attracting cavities and autodockvina

Joshua Anthony Vomo,Papireddypalli Sushma, Bukke Geethanjali, B Dhanush and Kanala Somasekhar Reddy *

Department of Pharmacology, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, K.R. Palli Cross, Chiyyedu (Post), Ananthapuarmu, Andhra Pradesh-515721-India.

Review Article

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 22(02), 120-125

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjbphs.2025.22.2.0452

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.22.2.0452

Received on 21 March 2025; revised on 27 April 2025; accepted on 30 April 2025

Molecular docking is a crucial computational tool in drug discovery enabling the prediction of ligand-target interactions and accelerating the screening of potential drug candidates. This study compares twowidely used docking algorithms AutodockVina and Attracting Cavities to evaluate their efficiency, accuracy and applicability in molecular docking studies. AutodockVina is known for its speed and computational efficiency making it suitable for high-throughput screening. In contrast, Attracting Cavities provides more accurate binding predictions particularly for covalent interactions but it requires significantly more computational time. The studies suggest that AutodockVina is preferable for rapid screening whereas Attracting Cavities is advantageous for detailed validation studies. Despite these advancements, molecular docking faces challenges in flexibility modelling, scoring function accuracy and solvation effects. Future directions involve integrating machine learning and quantum chemistry to improve predictive accuracy. This study highlights the importance of selecting docking algorithms based on study-specific requirements for drug discovery.

Algorithms; Molecular Docking; Autodockvina; Attracting Cavities and Swiss dock

https://wjbphs.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJBPHS-2025-0452.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Joshua Anthony Vomo, Papireddypalli Sushma, Bukke Geethanjali, B Dhanush and Kanala Somasekhar Reddy. Swiss Dock 2025: Docking approaches comparison between attracting cavities and autodockvina. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 22(02), 120-125. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.22.2.0452.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content


Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences (WJBPHS) - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution